A few days ago, as my flight
was pulling into the gate, the captain made an announcement. He wanted to thank
us for taking the flight and said something like, “Thanks for flying with
us...we know you had choices.”
In fact I wish I’d had a
choice. I didn’t in this case...but that brings me to the issue of captive
domiciles.
Captive owners have choices.
They have many of them, for there are many established productive and professional
captive domiciles in the United States. All of us captive professionals know
this, and we have our preferences. Our clients expect us to recommend domiciles
to them that are in their interest, not ours, and for the most part my
colleagues in the captive industry don’t steer captives to specific domiciles through
force of habit...but for other reasons, such as the experience of regulators,
the availability of first-tier services, and a general sense that a captive
domicile favors strong and sound regulation, but is also business-friendly in
its attitude towards the bearing of risk.
So here comes another captive
domicile. Do we need one? Is it necessary? Can another domicile compete
favorably with more established and perhaps more visible places for you to
warehouse your liabilities and the future of your risk profile?
I think Connecticut is the answer,
and if you let us, we’ll develop a strong case for that position.
First, look to the left. You’ll
see the email addresses of every member of the board of directors of the Connecticut
Captive Insurance Association. (They’re listed alphabetically...no favoritism
there.) Contact one of them. In fact, contact more than one. These people are
industry leaders. They manage captives; they audit them; they create them; they
reinsure them. They’ll give you some reasons why Connecticut should be your
destination.
Okay, so you’re not
convinced.
Look to the right. Contact
Janet Grace or Chris Gallo at the Connecticut Insurance Department. Those are
the people who will see and approve your business plan. They will be regulating
your captive. Their regulation will be thorough but at every step of the way business-friendly.
Find out what kind of people they are and what their oversight will mean to
your captive business.
I could also go on and on
about Connecticut being the “insurance capital of the United States”...and
that’s a statement that I actually happen to believe. But why is that important
to you as a captive owner? I could also tell you about the captives that have
already chosen Connecticut as a domicile. I could throw a lot of parent names
around...and some of the names are names you would recognize.
But, the straight answer is
that you should see this domicile for yourself.
In the next few weeks, this
blog will highlight legislative changes that will be made to our captive
statute, to streamline it, to make it more competitive, and to give
Commissioner Wade and her team the flexibility they need to approve and
regulate captive formations that stand right at the beginning of new and
exciting ways to manage risk in the public and private sectors.
You can come to the
Connecticut Captive Insurance Association Collaborative on October 25 and 26 in
Stamford, CT. Yes, this will be like a lot of captive symposia: there will be a
cocktail hour (with the requisite “heavy hors d'oeuvres”); you’ll get to mingle
and network; and, if you’re a service provider, you’ll see all your competitors
there so you can figure out who’s talking to whom!
But there will be something
more at the CCIA Collaborative. You’ll hear ideas. You’ll hear about something
called the Connecticut Hub for Innovation in Insurance (CHIINS), which we’ll be
launching this year, and which will be the nation’s first Innovation Hub for
alternative risk financing, risk management, and risk innovation debate and
discussion. (Imagine “InsureTech” and add to it cutting edge ideas about how to
maintain risk and mitigate claim expense and reputational harm...and add, for
extra measure, a place where your idea can get the second or the third or the
next hearing before you bring it to market.)
And how about the
microcaptive “problem”? Well, this year you’ll hear how to do one of these
formations correctly from the innovators and regulators who want the reputation
of these kinds of captive formations turned around. CCIA has already renamed
these Small Business Captives, or SBCs. We at CCIA are committed to going
back to the original and really first-class idea behind the 831(b) concept and,
through creative and resourceful ways, reinvigorate this useful small business
tool that has fallen on hard times.
In short, I do think we need
another domicile.
A domicile filled with
talented and creative people, who are solution-oriented and who, from the
governor of our state on down, are committed to earning your captive business.
Welcome to Connecticut. The
domicile of ideas...the domicile of choice.
Michael Maglaras, Chairman, Connecticut Captive Insurance Association
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.